Open science: human emancipation or bureaucratic serfdom?

Abstract

Keywords

Full Text:

Adendorff, L. (2010). Italy: University reform bill passes amid protests. University World News. Retrieved from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20101202200420174

Anderson, R. (2010). European Universities from the Enlightenment to 1914. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198206606.001.0001/acprof-9780198206606-chapter-4

Baccini, A., & De Nicolao, G. (2018). How pseudoscientific rankings are distorting research. Institute for New Economic Thinking. Retrieved from https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/how-pseudoscientific-rankings-are-distorting-research

Baccini, A., Nicolao, G. D., & Petrovich, E. (2019). Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis. PLOS ONE, 14(9). Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221212

Belluz, J. (2018). 20 years ago, research fraud catalyzed the anti-vaccination movement. Let’s not repeat history. Retrieved from Vox website: https://www.vox.com/2018/2/27/17057990/andrew-wakefield-vaccines-autism-study

Biagioli, M. (2016). Watch out for cheats in citation game. Nature. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/watch-out-for-cheats-in-citation-game-1.20246

Biagioli, M. (2018). Quality to Impact, Text to Metadata: Publication and Evaluation in the Age of Metrics. KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge, 2(2), 249–275. Retrieved from https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/699152

Bonaccorsi, A. (2015). La valutazione possibile. Teoria e pratica nel mondo della ricerca. (Bologna): Il Mulino.

Bonaccorsi, A. (Ed.). (2018a). The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons from the Italian Experience. Cham: Springer.

Bonaccorsi, A. (Ed.). (2018b). Towards an Epistemic Approach to Evaluation in SSH. In The evaluation of research in social sciences and humanities: Lessons from the italian experience. Cham: Springer.

Briggs, W. M. (2011). The sorites paradox isn’t. Retrieved from https://wmbriggs.com/post/3578

Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read

Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the Staggeringly Profitable Business of Scientific Publishing Bad for Science? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

Caso, R. (2017a). Perché l’ANVUR è ancora in vita? Bollettino telematico di filosofia politica. Retrieved from https://btfp.sp.unipi.it/it/2017/06/anvurcaso/

Caso, R. (2017b). Una valutazione (della ricerca) dal volto umano: La missione impossibile di Andrea Bonaccorsi. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.375968

Chan, L., Okune, A., Hill, R., Albornoz, D., & Posada, A. (Eds.). (2019). Contextualizing Openness: Situating Open Science. University of Ottawa Press IDRC - International Development Research Centre.

Chomsky-Foucault : « Justice contre pouvoir ». (2007). Le Monde Diplomatique. Retrieved from https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2007/08/A/15053

Cole, S. (1992). Making science : Between nature and society. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard U.P.

Creagh, S. (2011). Journal rankings ditched: The experts respond. The Conversation.

Csiszar, A. (2016). Peer review: Troubled from the start. Nature. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/news/peer-%20review-%20troubled-%20from-%20the-%20start-%201.19763

David, P. (2007). The historical origins of ’open science’. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2948/0da8855b61022f0e0a9fb5808444f428af08.pdf

Edwards, M. A., & Roy, S. (2016). Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0223

European Universities Association. (2009). Europe’s responses to economic crisis. University World News. Retrieved from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20090220085540843

Feynman, R. (1966). What is science? Retrieved from http://www.feynman.com/science/what-is-science

Figà-Talamanca, A. (2002). The "impact factor" in the evaluation of research. Bulletin Du Groupement International Pour La Recherche Scientifique En Stomatologie & Odontologie, 44(1). Retrieved from http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/bullgirso/article/view/5926

Finley, M. (1982). La democrazia antichi e dei moderni. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Fire, M., & Guestrin, C. (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: Observing Goodhart’s Law in action. GigaScience, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz053

Fitzpatrick, K. (2011). Planned obsolescence: Publishing, technology and the future of academia. Retrieved from http://mcpress.media-commons.org/plannedobsolescence/

Flaherty, C. (2015). The Costs of Publish or Perish. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/10/12/study-suggests-pressure-publish-impedes-innovation

Galilei, G. (1610). Lettera a Belisario Vinta. Retrieved from https://www.fondazionesancarlo.it/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Bucciantini.pdf#page=30

Guédon, J.-C. (2001). In Oldenburg’s Long Shadow. Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.arl.org/wp-content/uploads/2001/12/in-oldenburgs-long-shadow.pdf

Guédon, J.-C. (2017). Open access - toward the internet of the mind. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai15/Untitleddocument.docx

Hagner, M. (2018). Open access, data capitalism and academic publishing. Swiss Medical Weekly, 148(14600). https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14600

Harnad, S. (2003). Back to the oral tradition through skywriting at the speed of thought (Ranimer la tradition orale par la ciélographie à la vélocité de l’esprit). Les défis de la publication sur le web: Hyperlectures, cybertextes et méta-editions. Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/sic_00000315/

Holmwood, J. (2013). Markets versus dialogue: The debate over open access ignores competing philosophies of openness. LSE Impact Blog. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/10/21/markets-versus-dialogue/

Humboldt, W. von. (2010). Über die innere und äussere Organisation der höheren wissenschaſtlichen Anstalten in Berlin (C. Markschies, Ed.). https://doi.org/10.18452/4653

Huxley, A. (1958). Brave new world revisited. Retrieved from http://www.huxley.net/bnw-revisited/

Johns, A. (2009). Piracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kant, I. (1784). Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung? Retrieved from http://korpora.org/Kant/aa08/033.html

Kant, I. (1991). Political Writings (H. Reiss, Ed.; H. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Konrad, F.-M. (2012). Wilhelm von Humboldt’s contribution to a theory of Bildung. In P. Siljander, A. Kivelä, & A. Sutinen (Eds.), Theories of Bildung and Growth: Connections and Controversies Between Continental Educational Thinking and American Pragmatism. Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei: SensePublishers.

Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget. Retrieved from http://btfp.sp.unipi.it/?p=2842

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLOS ONE, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Leslie, I. (2016). The sugar conspiracy | Ian Leslie. The Guardian.

Lévy, P. (1997). L’universel sans totalité, essence de la cyberculture. Retrieved from http://www.ub.edu/prometheus21/articulos/obsciberprome/pierreluniversel.pdf

MacKie-Mason, J. (2018). Why force the OA transition now? An economist’s view. Retrieved from https://oa2020.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/B14-04-Jeffrey-MacKie-Mason.pdf

Markin, P. (2018). Preprint Repositories Gain in Institutional Legitimacy and Recognition, Reduce the Attractiveness of Subscription Journals. Retrieved from https://is.gd/oz6LVo

Mazzotti, M. (2012). Listing wildly. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/listing-wildly/421723.article?storycode=421723

Merton, R. K. (1941). Znaniecki’s "The Social Role of the Man of Knowledge".

Merton, R. K. (1942). The Normative Structure of Science. Retrieved from https://www.collier.sts.vt.edu/5424/pdfs/merton_1973.pdf

Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science. Retrieved from http://joelvelasco.net/teaching/3330/Merton%20Priorities%20in%20Science%201957.pdf

Merton, R. K. (1968). Behavior Patterns of Scientists. Retrieved from http://www.dcscience.net/merton-behavior-patterns-of-scientists-1968.pdf

Merton, R. K. (1973a). The Puritan Spur to Science. In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (pp. 228–253). Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/robert_K_merton_the_sociology_of_science

Merton, R. K. (1973b). The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (N. W. Storer, Ed.). Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/robert_K_merton_the_sociology_of_science

Moriarty, P. (2008). Reclaiming Academia from Post-Academia. Nature Nanotechnology, 3(2), 60–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.11

Moscon, V. (2013). Open Access to Scientific Articles: Comparing Italian with German law. Retrieved from http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2013/12/03/open-access-to-scientific-articles-comparing-italian-with-german-law/

Neeson, C. R. (2019). A Declaration of the Mission of University in Barlowspace. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1350&context=dltr

Pievatolo, M. C. (2006). «Friends have all things in common»: intellectual property, publishing, and politics. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.51532

Pievatolo, M. C. (2012). Jaron Lanier, You are not a Gadget. Bollettino telematico di filosofia politica. Retrieved from https://btfp.sp.unipi.it/it/2012/10/jaron-lanier-you-are-not-a-gadget/

Pievatolo, M. C. (2017). La bilancia e la spada: scienza di stato e valutazione della ricerca. Bollettino telematico di filosofia politica. Retrieved from https://commentbfp.sp.unipi.it/maria-chiara-pievatolo-la-bilancia-e-la-spada-scienza-di-stato-e-valutazione-della-ricerca/

Pinfield, S., & Rob, J. (2018). Adoption of Open Access Is Rising but so Too Are Its Costs. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/01/22/adoption-of-open-access-is-rising-but-so-too-are-its-costs/

Plato. (n.d.). Phaedrus. Retrieved from

http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg012.perseus-grc1:227a

Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton U.P.). Retrieved from http://www.andreasaltelli.eu/file/repository/Excerpts.pdf

Prodi, P. (2013). Università e città nella storia europea (Il Mulino). Retrieved from http://btfp.sp.unipi.it/dida/humboldt/#idp156368

Radder, H. (2010). The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the modern university.

Radder, H., Nordmann, A., & Schiemann, G. (Eds.). (2011). Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Ravetz, J. R. (2016). How Should We Treat Science’s Growing Pains? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/jun/08/how-should-we-treat-sciences-growing-pains

Redazione JLIS.it. (2012). Italian declaration supporting the Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities (2004). JLIS.it, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-8630

Redazione Roars. (2019). Bibliometric evaluation chokes innovation. But it’s OK because “We are not all Galilei and Newton”. ROARS. Retrieved from https://www.roars.it/online/bibliometric-evaluation-chokes-innovation-but-its-ok-because-we-are-not-all-galilei-and-newton/

Ringer, F. K. (1969). The decline of German Mandarins. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard U.P.

Rossi, P. (2015). La nascita della scienza moderna in Europa. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Rudwick, M. J. S. (1985). The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists. Retrieved from http://www.math.chalmers.se/~ulfp/Review/devon.pdf

Sample, I. (2012). Harvard University says it can’t afford journal publishers’ prices. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/apr/24/harvard-university-journal-publishers-prices

Santosuosso, A., Sellaroli, V., & Fabio, E. (2007). What constitutional protection for freedom of scientific research? Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(6), 342–344. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.020594

Shirky, C. (2010). The Shock of Inclusion. Edge. Retrieved from https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11609

Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2012). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384

SPARC. (2019). Landscape Analysis The Changing Academic Publishing Industry for Academic Institutions. Retrieved from https://sparcopen.org/our-work/landscape-analysis/

Srigley, R. (2018). Whose University Is It Anyway? Los Angeles Review of Books. Retrieved from https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/whose-university-is-it-anyway/

Tennant, J. (2019). “Transformative” Open Access Publishing Deals Are Only Entrenching Commercial Power. Times Higher Education (THE).

Velterop, J. (2016). On the dangers of SciHub and hybrid journals. Retrieved from https://blog.scielo.org/en/2016/03/22/on-the-dangers-of-scihub-and-hybrid-journals/

Weber, M. (1919). Science as a Vocation. Retrieved from http://anthropos-lab.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Weber-Science-as-a-Vocation.pdf

Weinberger, D. (2011). Too Big to Know. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_Big_to_Know

Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Ziman, J. (2000). Real Science: What It Is and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.