Articles

Conserving Architectural Heritage through Hybrid Strategies and Open Technologies in the Phygital Era


Abstract


In the current context of digital transformation, the MATHE method proposes a phygital strategy for the conservation, documentation and dissemination of architectural heritage. Tested on the Optical Telegraph Line between Madrid and Valencia, this integrated system combines Web-GIS, Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) in a coherent heritage valorisation proposal. The MATHE-GIS platform organises georeferenced and alphanumeric data in an accessible, open format, while MATHE-AR and MATHE-VR tools extend the heritage experience beyond physical boundaries. These technologies provide a hybrid, both on-site and off-site, experience that enhances users' understanding of cultural assets. It concludes that virtualisation, far from replacing the heritage object, constitutes a strategic avenue for its study, interpretation and dissemination, enabling more democratic, participatory and sustainable access.

Keywords


Architectural heritage, augmented reality, virtual reality, Web-GIS, phygital experience, optical telegraphy

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v15n2p121

References


Adão, T., Pádua, L., Narciso, D., Sousa, J. J., Agrellos, L., Peres, E., & Magalhães, L. (2019). MixAR: A multi-tracking mixed reality system to visualize virtual ancient buildings aligned upon ruins. Journal of Information Technology Research, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2019100101

Agrawal, S., & Gupta, R. D. (2017). Web GIS and its architecture: A review. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10, 518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3296-2

Alsadik, B. (2022). Crowdsource drone imagery: A powerful source for the 3D documentation of cultural heritage at risk. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1853851

Banfi, F., Brumana, R., & Stanga, C. (2019). Extended reality and informative models for the architectural heritage: From scan-to-BIM process to virtual and augmented reality. Virtual Archaeology Review, 10(21). https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2019.11923

Barbara, J., Grech, J., Camilleri, J., McGurk, S., & Theuma, C. (2020). Digitizing the Neolithic Hypogeum. In M. Ioannides, E. Fink, L. Cantoni, & E. Champion (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 12642, pp. 703–710). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73043-7_62

Bec, A., Moyle, B., Schaffer, V., & Timms, K. (2021). Virtual reality and mixed reality for second chance tourism. Tourism Management, 83, 104256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104256

Benavides López, J. A., Martín Civantos, J. M., & Rouco Collazo, J. (2020). Architectural survey and archaeological analysis of the Píñar Castle as a starting point for its conservation. Virtual Archaeology Review, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2020.12397

Bernardo, E., Musolino, M., & Maesano, M. (2021). San Pietro di Deca: From knowledge to restoration. Studies and geomatics investigations for conservation, redevelopment and promotion. In F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina, & C. Bevilacqua (Eds.), New Metropolitan Perspectives: Knowledge dynamics and innovation-driven policies towards urban and regional transition (Vol. 2, pp. 1572–1580). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_147

Bruno, S., & De Fino, M. (2021). Decision-making for historic building diagnosis by logical inference in HBIM approach: the case of onsite inspection of timber elements. SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology, 11(2), 67-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.2423//i22394303v11n2p67

Brusaporci, S. (2020). Toward smart heritage: Cultural challenges in digital built heritage. In S. Brusaporci (Ed.), Applying innovative technologies in heritage science (pp. 271–296). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2871-6.ch013

Lasorella, M., Cantatore, E., & Fatiguso, F. (2021). Smart approaches to enhance technical knowledge of in/low-accessible heritage (Italy). SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology, 11(2), 97–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v11n2p97

Čejka, J., Zsíros, A., & Liarokapis, F. (2020). A hybrid augmented reality guide for underwater cultural heritage sites. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 24(6), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01354-6

Costantino, D., Pepe, M., & Restuccia, A. G. (2023). Scan-to-HBIM for conservation and preservation of cultural heritage building: The case study of San Nicola in Montedoro church (Italy). Applied Geomatics, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00359-2

Currà, E., D’Amico, A., & Angelosanti, M. (2021). Representation and knowledge of historic construction: HBIM for structural use in the case of Villa Palma Guazzaroni in Terni. TEMA: Technological Engineering in Materials and Architecture, 7(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.30682/tema0701b

de-Dato, P. (2024). Conservación y puesta en valor del patrimonio en la era phygital: Metodología para rutas reales y virtuales mediante RA-RV / Conservazione e valorizzazione del patrimonio nell’era phygital: Metodologia per percorsi reali e virtuali mediante RA-RV (Doctoral thesis). Universitat Politècnica de València & Politecnico di Bari. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/204144

de-Dato, P., Hernández Navarro, Y., & Lasorella, M., (2025). El patrimonio en la era phygital: metodología para la conservación y puesta en valor. In III Simposio de Patrimonio Cultural ICOMOS España.Valladolid, edUPV. https://doi.org/10.4995/icomos2025.2025.21063

Dmytro, H., Arkadii, S., Tetiana, A., Dmytro, K., & Denys, Y. (2023). Advantages of using QGIS to solve spatial planning tasks. Baltic Surveying, 50.

Escrivá Estevan, F., & Madrid García, J. A. (2010). El mundo virtual en la restauración: Aplicaciones virtuales para la conservación y restauración del patrimonio. Arché, 4–5, 105–112.

Evangelidis, K., Sylaiou, S., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020). Mergin’ mode: Mixed reality and geoinformatics for monument demonstration. Applied Sciences, 10(11), 3826. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113826

Fatiguso, F., De Fino, M., Cantatore, E., & Caponio, V. (2017). Resilience of historic built environments: Inherent qualities and potential strategies. Procedia Engineering, 180, 1022-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.262

Fernie, K. (2024). 3D Content in Europeana: The Challenges of Providing Access. In: Hostettler, M., Buhlke, A., Drummer, C., Emmenegger, L., Reich, J., Stäheli, C. (eds) The 3 Dimensions of Digitalised Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53032-6_10

Ghani, I., Rafi, A., & Woods, P. (2020). The effect of immersion towards place presence in virtual heritage environments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 24(6), 881-895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01352-8

Izkara Martínez, J. L. (2010). Realidad aumentada móvil para la conservación del patrimonio (Doctoral thesis). Universidad del País Vasco – Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. https://www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/imprimirFicheroTesis. do?idFichero=v6SlPjgJBP0%3D.

Lasorella, M., Cantatore, E., de-Dato, P., & Fatiguso, F. (2022). Ar.KnoWeb (Architectural Knowledge Web): Una piattaforma metodologica per la conoscenza tecnica di architettoniche sistemiche. In E. Dassori & R. Morbiducci (Eds.), Memoria e innovazione (pp. 1439-1450). S.l.: EdicomEdizioni. ISBN 978-88-945937-4-7.

Liestøl, G., & Hadjidaki, E. (2020). Quasi–mixed reality in digital cultural heritage: Combining 3D reconstructions with real structures on location—The case of Ancient Phalasarna. In M. Ioannides (Ed.), Digital cultural heritage (pp. 423-432). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15200-0_29

Lo Presti, O., & Carli, M. R. (2021). Italian catacombs and their digital presence for underground heritage sustainability. Sustainability, 13(21), 12010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112010

Monterroso-Checa, A., Redondo-Villa, A., Gasparini, M., Hornero, A., Iraci, B., Martín-Talaverano, R., Moreno-Escribano, J. C., Muñoz-Cádiz, J., Murillo-Fragero, J. I., Obregón-Romero, R., Vargas, N., Young, S. J., Yuste, R., & Zarco-Tejada, P. (2020). A heritage science workflow to preserve and narrate a rural archaeological landscape using virtual reality: The Cerro del Castillo of Belmez and its surrounding environment (Córdoba, Spain). Applied Sciences, 10(23), 8659. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238659

Najjar, R., Amer, M., Charafeddine, M., & Raed, A. A. (2025). From Preservation to Participation: Digital Applications for Sustainable Cultural Tourism in Tripoli Old City. SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology, 15(1), 65-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v15n1p65

Napolitano, R. K., Scherer, G., & Glisic, B. (2018). Virtual tours and informational modeling for conservation of cultural heritage sites. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 29, 123–129.

Netek, R., Brus, J., & Tomecka, O. (2019). Performance testing on marker clustering and heatmap visualization techniques: A comparative study on JavaScript mapping libraries. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(8), 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8080348

Netek, R., Pohankova, T., Bittner, O., & Urban, D. (2023). Geospatial analysis in web browsers: A comparative study of WebGIS process-based applications. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(9), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12090374

Nevola, F., Coles, T., & Mosconi, C. (2022). Hidden Florence revealed? Critical insights from the operation of an augmented reality app in a World Heritage City. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 17(5), 454-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2022.2036165

Olivé Roig, S. (1990). Historia de la telegrafía óptica en España. Madrid: Secretaría General de Comunicaciones, Ministerio de Transporte y Turismo. ISBN 8486022452.

Palestini, C., Lolli, S., & Eramo, E. (2025). Tangible and Intangible: Digital Systems and Methodological Analysis for Understanding and Accessing the Cultural Heritage of Fragile Territories. SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology, 15(1), 17-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v15n1p17

Romeo López, J. M. (1980). El telégrafo óptico: 1790-1850: Estudio crítico comparativo de los diferentes sistemas de transmisión utilizados. In El científico español ante su historia: La ciencia en España entre 1750-1850. I Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias (pp. 241-250). S.l.: s.n. ISBN 8450041422.

Sezgin, A. C., & Karaman, E. E. (2022). The Internet of Things and cultural heritage. In M. Sigala, E. Christou, & U. Gretzel (Eds.), Handbook of research on digital communications, Internet of Things, and the future of cultural tourism (pp. 85–102). IGI Global.

Xian, X., & Shen, H. (2020). Assessing intentional use of AR in cultural heritage learning. In 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 93-96). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00029

Xiao, L. (2022). Research on online cloud experience system of featured tourism products based on computer virtual reality technology. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Big Data and Algorithms (EEBDA) (pp. 942-946). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEBDA53927.2022.9744802


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Pasquale de-Dato, Yolanda Hernández-Navarro, Elena Cantatore

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 

 

SCIRES-IT, e-ISSN 2239-4303

Journal founded by Virginia Valzano